Like I said, smaller teams of programmers just don’t have the time and resource larger teams do. No, this is not an accusation of laziness whatsoever.
In other words, they “get to it when they get to it”. Why? Because unofficial builds of browsers are released by small teams that don’t have the resources the major providers have. And sometimes this can take weeks or even months for this to happen. Whatever team is building the unofficial build receives a notice from the official provider, they compile a version, then release – but it’s always after that major provider releases it first. Major browsers release security updates quickly should any problems be discovered, and the unofficial builds are always second in line for them. Using unofficial builds of browsers is not exactly a good idea Yes, this does mean by having the three tabs open of webmail, Facebook and Netflix that Waterfox will explode up to half-a-gig of memory use just by sitting there just like Firefox does. The way the engine works just explodes in memory use by nature. That’s not fixed, and that’s not Waterfox’s fault at all. This is Firefox we’re talking aboutīeing that Waterfox is Firefox in 64-bit flavor, it still has the exact same memory-munching problem Firefox does. Startup and shutdown would show no major difference in speed. Document load time – especially over a network – would only be slightly faster on 64-bit (meaning you really wouldn’t notice any significant difference). Think of it this way: Would you notice a difference between a 32-bit Microsoft Word and a 64-bit Microsoft Word? Nope. You can benchmark-benchmark-benchmark all day long and spout out numbers-numbers-numbers, but the fact of the matter is that in practical use, you will notice little to no difference in performance compared to a 32-bit browser. In a browser application, 64-bit at this point really hasn’t proven to be any better than the 32-bit flavors.
#Waterfox for windows 8 download
Therefore, if you want to enjoy one of the best browsers working at 64-bit, all you have to do is download Waterfox.Now if we’re talking about, say, a video editing suite that requires gobs and gobs of memory to crunch and render video data faster, then oh yes, 64-bit is better because that architecture can process and access everything quicker.
The interface of both browsers is identical, something that favors the fact that any Firefox user can automatically get used to using Waterfox.įurthermore, Waterfox offers compatibility with the vast majority of add-ons created for the browser by Mozilla, and it even offers an improved experience when it comes to working with Java, Silverlight and Flash, because if supports the 64-bit version of all three platforms.
The answer as to the difference between Firefox and Waterfox is basic, because the second of the two has a response time and loading speed that is much quicker compared to the official version of the browser developed by Mozilla. Have you got a computer with a Windows 64-bit operating system? Are you fed up with the fact that Mozilla Firefox doesn't use the whole potential of your computer? The solution is here and it's called Waterfox, a version of the prestigious browser that has been compiled for 64-bit systems.
0 kommentar(er)
